blog Are You An "Intermediary" Or What?
Archives 171 entries
Back to Latest Entries
I note that, in addition to musicians, many indie labels and existing or potential business managers are signing up to find out what Fuzz is all about as it begins to gain critical mass [it is not there yet].

I was speaking with jeff, ceo of fuzz, the other day and discussing how best to describe the necessary function of the "intermediary" between the artist and the fans in the music industry. I say that this function is necessary because, by and large, the artists are not prepared to deal with the hundreds of details of running a business and, in my view, this is not the core strength that flows from their "persona" or raison d'etre. Artists are best left to dedicate themselves to extending their art and leave the "business side" of music to those who are willing to dedicate their energy to this tough end of the cycle of music discovery, marketing and distribution.

Jeff said that indie labels, business managers, consultants, and the like, were not in his mind "intermediaries", but "enablers". The problem is that the food-chain of enablers has become too extended and there are just too many mouths to feed with not enough left over for the source of the food chain, the artists. Thus, he and Fuzz think that the best of the "enablers" are those who are "disintermediaries" rather than "intermediaries".

Are you a good "disintermediary"?
Comments
posted on Nov 11 at 9:47 pm
The expression "Intermediary" is a good one. The expression "Disintermediary" is even better. Quite clever discussions you are having there, guys!
posted on Nov 12 at 12:59 am
tibii, here is another word for what might be going on in the food chain of music creation, discovery, marketing and distribution, "reintermediation"!.

Check out what wikipedia has to say about reintermediation in the music industry..

Whatever the correct term may be for it, clearly the dynamics of the music food chain are experiencing dramatic change. I agree with Paul Hawken, who is referenced in the wiki article, that the change "explains a lot of the good that is going on."
posted on Nov 13 at 12:45 pm
This is a fascinating topic. For one, I do totally agree with you and Jeff on this one. As the only employee of my record company, having certain resources has been undeniably important. Furthermore, if a band is label-less, the less time they need to spend on actual business the better. FUZZ serves an important function because - quite frankly - you know what you are getting. That is to say, in contrast to trying to navigate a band's own site, you know the format with FUZZ is going to be the same. Furthermore, you know it will have all the info you need - songs, news, tour dates, etc. It would appear that many bands are moving away from maintaining their own sites to utilizing the resources of the social networking ones. At the same time, however, we may see labels (more than the bands) emulate what these services do and eventually cut out the middle man. A fine example would be the recent opening of Sub Pop's digital music store. New and Used Records (my label!) is not nearly as powerful or deep as Sub Pop, so we will be on FUZZ and utilizing whatever resource we can for years to come.
Leave a comment
 
Warning!
Are you sure?